Not bad. I wish the tongue was a little taller. I'll be keeping these for sure.

I chose this model because something taller felt unnecessary. The sole is relatively sleek compared to a lugged one, but is still a chunky work boot. The 1964 leather was chosen because it's a Nick's exclusive. I had won a pair as part of last year's thunderdome, and figured it was a perfect opportunity to try something I can't get anywhere else.

I ultimately followed the SDP guidance on the 55 last - Half down from brannock and up a width. There were some exchanges at first, but that was my mistake in not having confidence in my brannock size which has since been alleviated. Nick's did offer input based on my other boots, but ultimately I knew what I wanted to try and I did.

Easy. Being a prize it was free, and Nick's was very lax about returns. I expected to have to pay shipping on one of my returns at least (I exchanged twice, I believe. I forget) but the bill never came. Their customer service was easy to deal with and prompt.

I work in a factory that produces electronic components. I've been transitioning off of the production floor and into a more (but not completely) office oriented role. These have seen the usual desk patina, but also have been exposed to drops of acetone and other solvents, some dilute acid, and etching solutions. There's also been some manual labor, but not very intense - occasionally crawling around to work on equipment. I've used them on some short walks, but nothing significant enough to warrant the word "hike." I didn't like the way the edges were wearing part way through, so I lightly sanded the finish off and refinished them myself. I much prefer this look now.

The only break in issue I had was on my ankle on the left boot. I suspect it was related to where an eyelet sat relative to my foot and not related to the leather. It has since gone away. The leather has held up well. There's some staining, but I think any brown boot will experience that with my usage. Even the rough chemical burn spot on the toe has plenty of juice left - no sign foreseeable failure. Care was a light coat of Venetian (shoe cream or leather balm, I forget) to add a little wax at the start. This was in hopes of delaying or preventing chemical spotting. Any dry spots throughout I would use bick4 or Smith's leather balm to spot condition. The one harsh chemical burn was moisturized after scraping off the burnt top layer with Smith's, then some wear and another spot of Smith's followed by tokonole to try and seal it.

It's okay but nothing to write home about. I believe I should have gone with a D width, but it's hard to tell. I think the ideal width is a split in the heel and E in the front for me. I got them skinny ankles, yo. Maybe related to the width, but the arch support feels a little off sometimes. This is in comparison to my 9.5E whites on the 55 which are a half size too small, I now realize, but arch support feels better.

It's okay, but I think for the retail price I would choose something else. I appreciate the Nick's team for giving me this opportunity, and I will keep and wear the boots, but prefer the patterns of other brands. No issues with finishing or durability.

Durable, solid sole. No sign of wearing through, and traction is fine but not exceptional.

Would receive as a prize again. Likely wouldn't purchase for full price. The "free range" line might be the right price for me too. I also love natural marks and scarring... Hell, I'd probably pay more for it. Ultimately: If you like the way they look, pull the trigger.